Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36912888›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Landmark-based spatial navigation across the human lifespan.

Marcia Bécu, Denis Sheynikhovich, Stephen Ramanoël, Guillaume Tatur, Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine, Colas N Authié, José-Alain Sahel, Angelo Arleo

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A cognitive-motor framework for spatial navigation in aging and early-stage Alzheimer's disease.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Age differences in spatial memory are mitigated during naturalistic navigation.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Spatial memory and hippocampal remapping: Who will age well?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcia BécuSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-1023
Denis SheynikhovichSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-8907
Stephen RamanoëlSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4735-1097
Guillaume TaturSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Anthony Ozier-LafontaineSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Colas N AuthiéInstitut de la Vision, Streetlab, Paris, France.
José-Alain SahelSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Angelo ArleoSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.

Funding

ANR ANR-14-CHIN-0001 ANR-14-CHIN-0002ANR ANR-18-IAHU-01ANR Labex LifeSenses ANR-10-LABX-65
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human spatial cognition has been mainly characterized in terms of egocentric (body-centered) and allocentric (world-centered) wayfinding bhavior. It was hypothesized that allocentric spatial coding, as a special high-level cognitive ability, develops later and deteriorates earlier than the egocentric one throughout lifetime. We challenged this hypothesis by testing the use of landmarks versus geometric cues in a cohort of 96 deeply phenotyped participants, who physically navigated an equiangular Y maze, surrounded by landmarks or an anisotropic one. The results show that an apparent allocentric deficit in children and aged navigators is caused specifically by difficulties in using landmarks for navigation while introducing a geometric polarization of space made these participants as efficient allocentric navigators as young adults. This finding suggests that allocentric behavior relies on two dissociable sensory processing systems that are differentially affected by human aging. Whereas landmark processing follows an inverted-U dependence on age, spatial geometry processing is conserved, highlighting its potential in improving navigation performance across the lifespan.

Indexed as

LongevitySpatial NavigationAgedAgingChildCuesHumansOrientation, SpatialSpace PerceptionYoung Adultgeometryhumanhuman aginglandmarkneurosciencespatial cognitionspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID36912888
PMCPMC10036117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read64
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.