Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36912872›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Diagnostic Ability of a Smartphone App for Dry Eye Disease: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Prospective, and Cross-sectional Study.

Ken Nagino, Yuichi Okumura, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Jaemyoung Sung, Masashi Nagao, Kenta Fujio, Yasutsugu Akasaki, Tianxiang Huang, Kunihiko Hirosawa, Masao Iwagami and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ken NaginoDepartment of Hospital Administration, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-6074
Yuichi OkumuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-5469
Masahiro YamaguchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2971-9321
Jaemyoung SungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-3687
Masashi NagaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8909-4650
Kenta FujioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-0800
Yasutsugu AkasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9527-0115
Tianxiang HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8867-1367
Kunihiko HirosawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-3697
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7079-0640
Akie Midorikawa-InomataDepartment of Hospital Administration, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6054-5710
Keiichi FujimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-0782
Atsuko EguchiDepartment of Hospital Administration, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5540-055X
Yukinobu OkajimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-4587
Koji KakisuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0535-3035
Yuto TeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1525-018X
Takefumi YamaguchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-2813
Daisuke TomidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-3600
Masaki FukuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-5338
Yukari Yagi-YaguchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-7741
Yuichi HoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-7976
Jun ShimazakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0435-3095
Shuko NojiriMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-8152
Yuki MorookaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-2659
Alan YeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5613-9613
Maria MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-2085
Mizu OhnoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1835-7038
Takenori InomataDepartment of Hospital Administration, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-1055
Juntendo University · JPTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital · JPToho University · JPJuntendo University Hospital · JPUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDry eye disease (DED) is one of the most common ocular surface diseases. Numerous patients with DED remain undiagnosed and inadequately treated, experiencing various subjective symptoms and a decrease in quality of life and work productivity. A mobile health smartphone app, namely, the DEA01, has been developed as a noninvasive, noncontact, and remote screening device, in the context of an ongoing paradigm shift in the health care system, to facilitate a diagnosis of DED.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the capabilities of the DEA01 smartphone app to facilitate a DED diagnosis.

methodsIn this multicenter, open-label, prospective, and cross-sectional study, the test method will involve using the DEA01 smartphone app to collect and evaluate DED symptoms, based on the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI), and to measure the maximum blink interval (MBI). The standard method will then involve a paper-based J-OSDI evaluation of subjective symptoms of DED and tear film breakup time (TFBUT) measurement in an in-person encounter. We will allocate 220 patients to DED and non-DED groups, based on the standard method. The primary outcome will be the sensitivity and specificity of the DED diagnosis according to the test method. Secondary outcomes will be the validity and reliability of the test method. The concordance rate, positive and negative predictive values, and the likelihood ratio between the test and standard methods will be assessed. The area under the curve of the test method will be evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The internal consistency of the app-based J-OSDI and the correlation between the app-based J-OSDI and paper-based J-OSDI will be assessed. A DED diagnosis cutoff value for the app-based MBI will be determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The app-based MBI will be assessed to determine a correlation between a slit lamp-based MBI and TFBUT. Adverse events and DEA01 failure data will be collected. Operability and usability will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.

resultsPatient enrollment will start in February 2023 and end in July 2023. The findings will be analyzed in August 2023, and the results will be reported from March 2024 onward.

conclusionsThis study may have implications in identifying a noninvasive, noncontact route to facilitate a diagnosis of DED. The DEA01 may enable a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation within a telemedicine setting and facilitate early intervention for undiagnosed patients with DED confronting health care access barriers.

trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs032220524; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs032220524. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/45218.

Indexed as

digital healthdigital therapeuticsdry eye diseaseJapanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Indexmaximum blink intervalmobile healthsmartphonesmartphone apptear film breakup timetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36912872
PMCPMC10131757
OpenAlexW4324020939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.