Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36912412›Full record

ReviewTuberkuloz ve toraks2023

Biological therapy management from the initial selection of biologics to switching between biologics in severe asthma.

İnsu Yılmaz, Gülden Paçacı Çetin, Bahar Arslan, Serhat Şeker, Hatice Eylül Bozkurt Yılmaz, Elif Aktaş Yapıcı, Serpil Köylüce, Elif Açar

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tuberkuloz ve toraks, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

İnsu YılmazDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Gülden Paçacı ÇetinDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Bahar ArslanDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Serhat ŞekerDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Hatice Eylül Bozkurt YılmazDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Elif Aktaş YapıcıDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Serpil KöylüceDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Elif AçarDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Erciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to elaborate the management of biologic therapy from initial selection to switching biologics in severe asthma. A nonsystematic review was performed for biological therapy management in severe asthma. Depending on clinical characteristics and biomarkers, selecting the preferred biologic based on super-responder criteria from previous studies may result in adequate clinical efficacy in most patients. On the other hand, no matter how carefully the choice is made, in some patients, it may be necessary to discontinue the drug due to suboptimal clinical response or even no response. This may result in the need to switch to a different biological therapy. How long the biological treatment of patients whose asthma is controlled with biologics will be continued and according to which criteria they will be terminated remains unclear. It has been shown that in patients with a long history of good response to biologics, asthma control may be impaired when biologics are discontinued, while it may persist in others. Therefore, discontinuation of biologics may be a viable strategy in a particular patient group. Clinicians should make the best use of all predictive factors to identify patients who will most benefit from each biologic. Patients who do not meet a predefined response criterion after sufficient time for response evaluation and who are eligible for one or more alternative biological agents should be offered the opportunity to switch to another biologic. There is no consensus on when the biologics used in severe asthma that produce favorable results should be discontinued. In our opinion, treatment should continue for at least five years, as premature termination may potentially deteriorate asthma control.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiological ProductsBiological TherapyBiomarkersHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiological ProductsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36912412
PMCPMC10854061
OpenAlexW4324017630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.