Effect of arthroscopic subacromial decompression during arthroscopic repair of small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears.

Background: Although arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) is a commonly used procedure during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), the effect of ASD on the clinical outcomes for ARCR is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ARCR with or without ASD. Methods: Patients (n = 315 with 320 shoulders) who underwent ARCR for small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears were followed for at least 24 months. ARCR was performed with ASD (180 shoulders, group A) or without ASD (140 shoulders, group N). There were no significant differences in patient demographics, including mean age and mean follow-up time. Rotator cuff repair was performed using the suture-bridge technique in all shoulders, and all patients were treated using the same rehabilitation protocol after surgery. University of California at Los Angeles score, Constant score, re-tear rates, revision surgery rates, and operating time were compared between groups. Re-tear was defined as Sugaya classification Types 4 and 5 using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at more than 12 months. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes before and after ARCR between groups. However, the University of California at Los Angeles scores and Constant scores significantly improved in both groups after surgery ( Conclusion: These results suggest that ASD has a limited effect on clinical outcomes of ARCR for small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears.