Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911669›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Dose and route of administration determine the efficacy of prophylactic immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a Brown Norway rat model.

Tiffany Kirkaldy Spaanager Sztuk, Neil Marcus Rigby, Lasse Nørskov-Nielsen, Stef J Koppelman, Ana Isabel Sancho, Niels-Peter Hell Knudsen, Justin Marsh, Philip Johnson, Shashank Gupta, Alan Robert Mackie and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mouse Models of Food Allergies: Where Do They Take Us?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tiffany Kirkaldy Spaanager SztukNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Neil Marcus RigbySchool of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Lasse Nørskov-NielsenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Stef J KoppelmanInstitute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Ana Isabel SanchoNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Niels-Peter Hell KnudsenImmunology, ALK, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Justin MarshInstitute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Philip JohnsonInstitute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Shashank GuptaImmunology, ALK, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Alan Robert MackieSchool of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jeppe Madura LarsenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Katrine Lindholm BøghNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USALK-Abelló (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) is emerging as a viable option for treatment of peanut allergy. Yet, prophylactic IT remains unexplored despite early introduction of peanut in infancy was shown to prevent allergy. There is a need to understand how allergens interact with the immune system depending on the route of administration, and how different dosages of allergen may protect from sensitisation and a clinical active allergy. Here we compared peanut allergen delivery Methods: BN rats were administered PBS or three different doses of peanut protein extract (PPE) Results: Low and medium dose OIT (1 and 10 mg) and all doses of SCIT (1, 10, 100 µg) induced sensitisation to PPE, whereas high dose OIT (100 mg), SLIT (10, 100 or 1000 µg) or IGIT (1, 10 and 100 mg) did not. High dose OIT and SLIT as well as high and medium dose IGIT prevented sensitisation from the following IP injections of PPE and suppressed PPE-specific IgE levels in a dose-dependent manner. Hence, administration of peanut protein Discussion: Collectively, this study showed that the preventive effect of allergen-specific IT is determined by the interplay between the specific site of PPE delivery for presentation to the immune system, and the allergen quantity, and that targeting and modulating tolerance mechanisms at specific mucosal sites may be a prophylactic strategy for prevention of peanut allergy.

Indexed as

Peanut HypersensitivityAdministration, OralAllergensAnimalsArachisDesensitization, ImmunologicImmunoglobulin ERatsRats, Inbred BNAllergensImmunoglobulin Eanimal modelfood allergygastric immunotherapyIgEoral immunotherapypeanut allergysubcutaneous immunotherapysublingual immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36911669
PMCPMC9996042
OpenAlexW4321616464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.