ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2023
Turkish Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Study of the Children and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Family Questionnaire.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How do the measurement properties of the broad-band scales for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children perform based on the COSMIN guidelines?BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Investigation of phubbing behavior in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and cognitive disengagement syndrome: a case-control study in adolescent.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to conduct the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability analyses of the Children and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) Family Questionnaire. Method: A total of 1015 parents of children and adolescents aged 6-14 years, with 762 from the community sample and 253 from the clinical sample, participated in the study. After the language adaptation of the scale was completed by experts, its construct validity was determined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and discriminant validity. The reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficients, and the test-retest reliability of the scale was tested on 100 participants. Results: The results of the EFA showed that the scale had 10 factors. The items associated with the 10th factor, which was different from the original scale, aligned with the subscales of the Sluggish Cognitive Tempo. The results of the CFA indicated that the factor load values were statistically significant, and the fit index values were at moderate, good, and excellent levels. A comparison of the subscale scores of the clinical and population sample groups showed that the scale had a distinctive feature. The Cronbach's alpha value of the total scale score was calculated to be 0.94. No statistically significant difference was found between the mean test-retest scores obtained on the subscales. The test-retest correlation coefficient was found to be within the range of r=0.605-0.853 for the subscales (p<0.01). Conclusion: This study proved that the CABI Family Questionnaire was a valid and reliable scale and could be administered to the parents of Turkish children and adolescents aged between six and 14 years in population and clinical samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.