Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911565›Full record

ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2023

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the ECT Perception and Knowledge Scale.

Yusuf Ezel Yıldırım, Pınar Çetinay Aydın, Nalan Öztürk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yusuf Ezel YıldırımTrabzon Of State Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Trabzon, Turkey.
Pınar Çetinay AydınUniversity of Health Sciences, Bakırköy Mazhar Osman Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases, Department of Psychiatry, İstanbul, Turkey.
Nalan ÖztürkBaşakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) is an effective and safe treatment method used in the treatment of various psychiatric diseases. However, negative attitudes associated with ECT are common. This causes many negative consequences, from the treatment preference to treatment response and stigma. In this study, we aimed to carry out a validity-reliability analysis of the ECT Perception and Knowledge Scale (ECT-PK), which was developed to determine the perception and knowledge levels related to ECT, and adapt it to Turkish. Method: The Turkish adaptation of the ECT-PK was made using the translation-retranslation method. Our study included 50 patients with schizophrenia, 50 patients with bipolar disorder, 50 patients with major depression who met the remission criteria determined separately for each disorder, and 150 healthy controls.. To measure test-retest reliability, the scale was re-applied to 30 patients randomly selected from the patient group 14-21 days after the first application of the scale. Results: In our study, a significant difference was found in both the patient and control groups in terms of the history of ECT application in the past and the status of accepting ECT application when recommended, and the perception and knowledge subscales of the ECT-PK. These results support the construct and criterion validity of the ECT-PK. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.85 for the perception subscale and 0.78 for the knowledge subscale. The intra-class correlation coefficient used to evaluate the test-retest reliability was 0.86 for the perception scale and 0.83 for the knowledge subscale. Conclusion: It has been shown that the ECT-PK is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to measure the perception and knowledge levels related to ECT in both clinical and non-clinical groups.

Indexed as

ECT-PK scalereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36911565
PMCPMC9999222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.