ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2022
PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A systematic review.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reprioritising consultation in scoping reviews: Clarifying purposes and practices.Medical education · 2026Article
- Food Classification for Swallowing Disorders Perception by Senior Population.Journal of texture studies · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Principles and Strategies for Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Community engagement in health guidelines and other normative products: a methodological review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Review
- Sports Pre-Participation Evaluation in Healthy Adults-A Survey-Based Assessment of Guideline Acceptability and Feasibility Among Sports Physicians and Participants.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Patient involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines in Germany-A meta-research study.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Development and contextual analysis of a person-centered professional practice model in a home care service in French-speaking Switzerland.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Guidance on sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health in humanitarian and fragile settings: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Stakeholder involvement in a Cochrane review of physical rehabilitation after stroke: Description and reflections.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2023Article
- Corrigendum.Campbell systematic reviews · 2023Article
- PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2023
- Updated by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: to identify, describe, and summarize existing guidance and methods for multistakeholder engagement throughout the health guideline development process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.