ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2022
PROTOCOL: Conflict of interest issues when engaging stakeholders in health and healthcare guideline development: a systematic review.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Dialogical meanderings - evaluation framework and learnings from stakeholder involvement in the co-design of a participatory systematic review.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Introducing a Series of Reviews Assessing Engagement in Evidence Syntheses.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2025Article
- A bespoke rapid evidence review process engaging stakeholders for supporting evolving and time-sensitive policy and clinical decision-making: reflection and lessons learned from the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre 2021-2023.Health research policy and systems · 2025Review
- Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Leveling the Research Playing Field: Decolonizing Global Health Research Through Web-Based Platforms.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Article
- PROTOCOL: Conflict of interest issues when engaging stakeholders in health and healthcare guideline development: a systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The overall objective of this study is to gather and summarize the existing literature on conflict of interest issues when engaging stakeholders in guideline development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.