Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911286›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2023

Young women with familial hypercholesterolemia have higher LDL-cholesterol burden than men: Novel data using repeated measurements during 12-years follow-up.

Anja K Johansen, Martin P Bogsrud, Jacob J Christensen, Amanda Rundblad, Ingunn Narverud, Stine Ulven, Gisle Langslet, Kjetil Retterstøl, Kirsten B Holven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Stable angina in young women.European heart journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Life Course Approach for Managing Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Special Aspects of Cholesterol Metabolism in Women.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex Differences in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anja K JohansenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Martin P BogsrudUnit for Cardiac and Cardiovascular Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jacob J ChristensenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Amanda RundbladDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingunn NarverudNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Stine UlvenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gisle LangsletLipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kjetil RetterstølDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kirsten B HolvenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: The concentration and the duration of exposure to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (LDL-C burden) is an important determinant of risk for cardiovascular disease and thresholds has recently been estimated. Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The overall aim of the present study was to describe differences in LDL-C level and LDL-C burden in females and males with FH visiting an outpatient lipid clinic from a young age, using multiple LDL-C measurements during a follow-up time of 12 years. First, we aimed to study if the LDL-C concentration and the LDL-C burden is different between females and males at ages 0-10, 10-20, 20-30 and >30 years. Second, we aimed to estimate the subject-specific LDL-C burden at age 19 and 30 years, and the proportion of female and male patients that reach suggested LDL-C thresholds indicating high risk of ASCVD. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from medical records of 438 subjects (207 girls and 231 boys) with FH, referred to the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital below the age of 19 years. The LDL-C burden was estimated based on repeated LDL-C measurements over time. Results: Subjects were followed over a period of mean 12.0 (SD 7.0) years, with median 10 years (7-17; 25-75 percentiles, minimum 2), with median 6 (4-9; 25-75 percentiles, minimum 2) available LDL-C measurements, starting at mean age 11 (SD 3.9) years. There was a difference in both LDL-C and LDL-C burden between sexes at different ages. On average, males had lower LDL-C over time, although this difference was less pronounced with age and males also had lower estimated LDL-C burden over time, and this difference was further exacerbated with age. Conclusion: Our study shows that young women with FH have a higher LDL-C burden than their male counterparts, potentially explaining the increased excess CVD risk seen among these. It underscores the importance of careful-follow up and early treatment initiation both prior to and after pregnancies in order to limit statin-free periods.

Indexed as

Cholesterol loweringFamilial hypercholesterolemiaLow-density-lipoprotein exposureSex-differences

Identifiers

PMID36911286
PMCPMC9995918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.