ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2023
Young women with familial hypercholesterolemia have higher LDL-cholesterol burden than men: Novel data using repeated measurements during 12-years follow-up.
Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Statin use in pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: a Norwegian nationwide study.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- Evinacumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: long-term safety and efficacy.European heart journal · 2024Trial
- Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Stable angina in young women.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Women: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Cardiovascular Outcomes Across the Lifespan.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Sex Differences in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Japanese Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Survey on the Current Status of Perinatal Management among Women with Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Japan.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- From Risk to Resilience: Transforming Perinatal Management for Women with FH.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Impact of Genetic Testing and Sex Differences among Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Hokuriku-plus Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Observational
- LDL cholesterol burden in elderly patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: Insights from real-world data.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Life Course Approach for Managing Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Special Aspects of Cholesterol Metabolism in Women.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Review
- Plasma cholesterol levels in infancy: a neglected resource.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Women, lipids, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a call to action from the European Atherosclerosis Society.European heart journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The concentration and the duration of exposure to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (LDL-C burden) is an important determinant of risk for cardiovascular disease and thresholds has recently been estimated. Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The overall aim of the present study was to describe differences in LDL-C level and LDL-C burden in females and males with FH visiting an outpatient lipid clinic from a young age, using multiple LDL-C measurements during a follow-up time of 12 years. First, we aimed to study if the LDL-C concentration and the LDL-C burden is different between females and males at ages 0-10, 10-20, 20-30 and >30 years. Second, we aimed to estimate the subject-specific LDL-C burden at age 19 and 30 years, and the proportion of female and male patients that reach suggested LDL-C thresholds indicating high risk of ASCVD. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from medical records of 438 subjects (207 girls and 231 boys) with FH, referred to the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital below the age of 19 years. The LDL-C burden was estimated based on repeated LDL-C measurements over time. Results: Subjects were followed over a period of mean 12.0 (SD 7.0) years, with median 10 years (7-17; 25-75 percentiles, minimum 2), with median 6 (4-9; 25-75 percentiles, minimum 2) available LDL-C measurements, starting at mean age 11 (SD 3.9) years. There was a difference in both LDL-C and LDL-C burden between sexes at different ages. On average, males had lower LDL-C over time, although this difference was less pronounced with age and males also had lower estimated LDL-C burden over time, and this difference was further exacerbated with age. Conclusion: Our study shows that young women with FH have a higher LDL-C burden than their male counterparts, potentially explaining the increased excess CVD risk seen among these. It underscores the importance of careful-follow up and early treatment initiation both prior to and after pregnancies in order to limit statin-free periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.