Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911253›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2023

Comparison between Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Prepyloric Submucosal Tumors: A Case-Matched Controlled Study.

Wengang Zhang, Jiafeng Wang, Ningli Chai, Enqiang Linghu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wengang ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-0283
Jiafeng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7413-770X
Ningli ChaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-5544
Enqiang LinghuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-7877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a well-established treatment method for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, there existed some challenges to perform ESD for prepyloric SMTs on account of the special location. Recently, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) provided a novel option for prepyloric SMTs. This study aimed to make a comprehensive comparison between prepyloric STER (P-STER) and ESD for the treatment of prepyloric SMTs. Methods: Patients with prepyloric SMTs undergoing P-STER treatment between January 2016 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and individually matched at 1 : 1 ratio with those with ESD treatment according to lesion size, lesion location, pathologic diagnosis, lesion origin, and surgery date, forming P-STER and ESD group, respectively. A sample size of 12 patients was collected for each group. Treatment outcomes including resection time, en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and postoperative hospital stay as well as occurrence of complications were evaluated. Results: Compared with ESD group, P-STER group got shorter resection time (52.50 minutes for ESD group vs. 38.67 minutes for P-STER group, Conclusions: For the treatment of prepyloric SMTs, P-STER appeared to be a more effective endoscopic technique compared with ESD, although further randomized controlled trials were warranted.

Identifiers

PMID36911253
PMCPMC9995185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.