Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911248›Full record

ReviewJournal of smoking cessation2023

Hospitalised Smokers' and Staff Perspectives of Inpatient Smoking Cessation Interventions and Impact on Smokers' Quality of Life: An Integrative Review of the Qualitative Literature.

Leah Epton, Shane Patman, Tracey Coventry, Caroline Bulsara

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of smoking cessation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient Satisfaction Survey for Inpatient Tobacco Cessation Treatment.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leah EptonFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences & Physiotherapy, University of Notre Dame Australia, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, Australia 6959.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-8688
Shane PatmanFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences & Physiotherapy, University of Notre Dame Australia, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, Australia 6959.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7476-1692
Tracey CoventrySchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, Australia 6959.
Caroline BulsaraSchool of Nursing and Midwifery and Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, Australia 6959.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To identify, integrate, and appraise the evidence on hospitalised smokers' and staff perspectives of inpatient smoking cessation interventions and the impact on smokers' quality of life. Design: The integrative review method was used to present hospitalised smokers' and staff perspectives of inpatient smoking cessation interventions. Results: The key findings from this integrative review included positive evaluations from both patients and staff involved in inpatient smoking cessation interventions, reporting that hospitalisation was an appropriate opportunity to address smoking cessation. A number of facilitators and barriers to inpatient smoking cessation interventions included creating a supportive patient-centred environment and consideration of the cost of nicotine replacement therapy and time to deliver inpatient smoking cessation interventions. Recommendations/preferences for future inpatient smoking cessation interventions included the use of a program champion and ongoing education to demonstrate the effectiveness of the intervention, and despite the cost of nicotine replacement therapy being identified as a potential barrier, it was identified as a preference for most patients. Although quality of life was only evaluated in two studies, statistically significant improvements were identified in both. Conclusion: This qualitative integrative review provides further insight into both clinician and patient participants' perspectives on inpatient smoking cessation interventions. Overall, they are seen to produce positive benefits, and staff training appears to be an effective means for service delivery. However, insufficient time and lack of resources or expertise appear to be consistent barriers to the delivery of these services, so they should be considered when planning the implementation of an inpatient smoking cessation intervention.

Identifiers

PMID36911248
PMCPMC10005874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.