ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023
Fracture strength test of digitally produced ceramic-filled and unfilled dental resin restorations via 3d printing: An
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fractographic analysis of 3D printed hybrid ceramic single crowns with different aging and post-curing times: an in-vitro study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of curing temperature on accuracy and physical properties of additively manufactured FDPs and bar specimens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing Resin-Based Dental Provisional Crowns and Bridges: Recent Progress in Properties, Applications, and Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Conventional vs. 3D printed band and loop space maintainers: a fracture strength analysis.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical efficiency of 3D-printed permanent and provisional implant cemented fixed bridges produced via CAD/CAM technology using an interim and a permanent ceramic filled hybrid material. Material and Methods: Two groups with twenty specimens each were designed and 3D-printed via digital light processing technology (DLP). A fracture strength test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed ( Results: For the fracture resistance and impression distance no significant difference ( Conclusions: In this
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.