ReviewGastroenterology report2023
Key quality indicators in colonoscopy.
Review in Gastroenterology report, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- EFFICACY OF WATER INFUSION VERSUS AIR/CO2 INSUFFLATION FOR COLONOSCOPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review: risk prediction models for metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Pooled it
- Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Development and External Validation of a Large Language Model-Based Clinical Decision-Support System for Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026Article
- Impact of sedation on adenoma and polyp detection rates and cecal intubation in elderly patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Safety and Outcomes of Colonoscopy in Cardiac Transplant Candidates with Severely Versus Non-severely Reduced Left Ventricular Function: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Interobserver variability in colonoscopy quality assessment: a retrospective standardized multicenter video-based study.Archive of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Quality indicators in colonoscopies performed in digestive endoscopy services in northeast Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating quality indicators in colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical tests: a five-year study from a developing country.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Not losing sight of the bigger picture of complications associated with post-polypectomy syndrome: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Adenoma per polypectomy as a training metric in colonoscopy: a retrospective analysis of trainee progression compared to expert performance.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Combating Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Insight from the Trials and Cohort Studies.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Effect of Cholecystectomy on Bubble Formation and Endoscopic Visualization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of a novel rigidizing overtube in completing difficult colonoscopies and for challenging colorectal polyp resection.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- AI and Polyp Detection During Colonoscopy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Bowel preparation assessment using artificial intelligence: Systematic review.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- ARE QUALITY INDICATORS IMPORTANT IN COLONOSCOPIES? ANALYSIS OF 3,076 EXAMS IN A PRIVATE TERTIARY SERVICE IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025Observational
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopy in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors: A Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many quality indicators have been proposed for colonoscopy, but most colonoscopists and endoscopy groups focus on measuring the adenoma detection rate and the cecal intubation rate. Use of proper screening and surveillance intervals is another accepted key indicator but it is seldom evaluated in clinical practice. Bowel preparation efficacy and polyp resection skills are areas that are emerging as potential key or priority indicators. This review summarizes and provides an update on key performance indicators for colonoscopy quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.