Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911042›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab as a second line biologic after tocilizumab treatment failure in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre cohort study using routinely collected health data.

Ekaterina Alexeeva, Elizaveta Krekhova, Tatyana Dvoryakovskaya, Ksenia Isaeva, Aleksandra Chomakhidze, Evgeniya Chistyakova, Olga Lomakina, Rina Denisova, Anna Mamutova, Anna Fetisova and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ekaterina AlexeevaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elizaveta KrekhovaDepartment of Paediatrics and Paediatric Rheumatology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Tatyana DvoryakovskayaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ksenia IsaevaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Aleksandra ChomakhidzeDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Evgeniya ChistyakovaDepartment of Paediatrics and Paediatric Rheumatology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Olga LomakinaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Rina DenisovaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anna MamutovaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anna FetisovaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Marina GautierDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Dariya VankovaDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ivan KriulinDepartment of Rheumatology, National Medical Research Centre for Children's Health, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ruslan SaygitovAssociation of Paediatric Rheumatologists, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A significant number of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) patients discontinue biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Studies of biologic therapy switch regimens in sJIA are required. Methods: Patients with sJIA who switched from tocilizumab (due to lack of efficacy or safety) to canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and were hospitalized at the rheumatology department from August 2012 to July 2020 were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were 30% or greater improvement based on the paediatric criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR30), achievement of inactive disease (JADAS-71 = 0) and clinical remission (ACR sJIA clinical inactive disease criteria). Follow-up from time first canakinumab dose administered was 12 months or the closest time point (not less than 6 and not more than 18 months). Data were extracted from electronic outpatient medical records. Results: During the study period, 46 patients with sJIA switched from tocilizumab to canakinumab. Median age at baseline was 8.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.0-12.9] years, with the median sJIA duration being 1.8 (IQR 0.8-5.8) years; 37 (80%) patients received at least one conventional DMARD (cDMARD; oral corticosteroids, methotrexate and/or cyclosporine A). Study outcomes were followed up in 45 patients (one patient did not attend the follow-up for an unknown reason); median follow-up was 359 (IQR 282-404) days. During the follow-up, 1 patient discontinued canakinumab due to tuberculosis detection and the dose was reduced or the injection interval increased in 4 (9%) patients. In total, 27 (60%) patients continued to receive at least one cDMARD. Improvement according to the ACR30 criteria was achieved in 43 patients [96%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85-99], inactive disease in 42 (93%; 95%CI 82-98), and remission in 37 (82%; 95% CI 69-91); after adjustment for actual time-at-risk, the rates were 83, 85 and 73 events per 100 person-years, respectively. During follow-up, 23 AEs (most frequently infections) were reported in 19/45 (42%) patients; 5/45 (11%) patients developed macrophage activation syndrome, with a favorable outcome in all cases. Conclusions: One-year canakinumab therapy was found to be potentially effective as second-line biologic therapy after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA.

Indexed as

canakinumabsecond-line biologicswitchingsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritistocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID36911042
PMCPMC9992960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.