Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36911005›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of preventive medicine2022

A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines.

Sajjad Rahimi Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi Pordanjani, Hasan Askarpour, Mehrdad Arjmand, Masoudeh Babakhanian, Masoud Amiri, Elaheh Mazaheri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sajjad Rahimi PordanjaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Ali Rahimi PordanjaniStudent Research Committee, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran.
Hasan AskarpourDepartment of Disease Management, Deputy of Health, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Mehrdad ArjmandDepartment of Disease Management, Deputy of Health, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Masoudeh BabakhanianSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Masoud AmiriDepartment of Disease Management, Deputy of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Elaheh MazaheriHealth Information Technology Research Center, Students Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Mashhad · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on humans, of which eight vaccines reached phase four clinical trials in humans and approved by FDA and EUA. After the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had the highest efficacy (95%), the efficacy of the other vaccines are as follows: Moderna 94.5%, Sputnik V 91%, Novavax 89.7%, Sinopharm 79.3%, Oxford/AstraZenaca 70.4%, Johnson and Johnson 66.9%, and Sinovac 50.7%. At present, protein-based vaccines, with 35% of all available COVID-19 vaccines, are the most common technique in the vaccine production, and then there are vaccines of non-replicating viral vector (13.3%), mRNA1 (12.1%), DNA (10.2%), replicating viral vector (9.8%), and inactivated vaccines (8.2%). The most frequently recognized adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose involved fever, fatigue, headache, chill, and myalgia. The mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher occurrence of local side effects (78.3 vs. 70.4%; Sig. = 0.064), whereas the viral vector-based vaccine was associated with a higher prevalence of systemic side effects (87.2 vs. 61%; Sig. < 0.001). Based on the evidence and articles in the field of vaccination, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinopharm vaccines reported the highest and lowest side effects, respectively. Because of being emerging, pathogenicity, and high infectivity of COVID-19, vaccination against the disease to prevent its incident rate and decrease the prevalence rate is recommended immediately. Being informed of various aspects of the existing vaccines such as efficacy, effectiveness, safety, etc.can accelerate to make effective and useful choices and consequently have a vaccinated community against the epidemic.

Indexed as

Comprehensive reviewCOVID-19efficacysafetyvaccinationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID36911005
PMCPMC9999094
OpenAlexW4321365105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.