Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910911›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2023

Can Patients with Dementia Be Identified in Primary Care Electronic Medical Records Using Natural Language Processing?

Laura C Maclagan, Mohamed Abdalla, Daniel A Harris, Therese A Stukel, Branson Chen, Elisa Candido, Richard H Swartz, Andrea Iaboni, R Liisa Jaakkimainen, Susan E Bronskill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Home Health Care Patients at Risk for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura C MaclaganICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.
Mohamed AbdallaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel A HarrisDivision of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Therese A StukelICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.
Branson ChenICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.
Elisa CandidoICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.
Richard H SwartzICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.
Andrea IaboniKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
R Liisa JaakkimainenICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.
Susan E BronskillICES, G1-06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-0655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia and mild cognitive impairment can be underrecognized in primary care practice and research. Free-text fields in electronic medical records (EMRs) are a rich source of information which might support increased detection and enable a better understanding of populations at risk of dementia. We used natural language processing (NLP) to identify dementia-related features in EMRs and compared the performance of supervised machine learning models to classify patients with dementia. We assembled a cohort of primary care patients aged 66 + years in Ontario, Canada, from EMR notes collected until December 2016: 526 with dementia and 44,148 without dementia. We identified dementia-related features by applying published lists, clinician input, and NLP with word embeddings to free-text progress and consult notes and organized features into thematic groups. Using machine learning models, we compared the performance of features to detect dementia, overall and during time periods relative to dementia case ascertainment in health administrative databases. Over 900 dementia-related features were identified and grouped into eight themes (including symptoms, social, function, cognition). Using notes from all time periods, LASSO had the best performance (F1 score: 77.2%, sensitivity: 71.5%, specificity: 99.8%). Model performance was poor when notes written before case ascertainment were included (F1 score: 14.4%, sensitivity: 8.3%, specificity 99.9%) but improved as later notes were added. While similar models may eventually improve recognition of cognitive issues and dementia in primary care EMRs, our findings suggest that further research is needed to identify which additional EMR components might be useful to promote early detection of dementia. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-023-00125-6.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDementiaElectronic health recordsNatural language processingPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID36910911
PMCPMC9995630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.