Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910896›Full record

ArticleProstate international2023

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning curves and outcomes from an Australian perspective.

Sachin Perera, Nadil Fernando, Jonathan O'Brien, Declan Murphy, Nathan Lawrentschuk

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06279260 (National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06279260 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database: Exploring Learning Curves and Long Term Surgical, Oncological and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMelbourne HealthRan2024 to 2050Enrolled10,000ConditionsDatabase, Prostate Cancer, Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy, Surgical Outcomes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sachin PereraDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
Nadil FernandoDepartment of Science, Deakin University, Australia.
Jonathan O'BrienDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Declan MurphyDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been a treatment for men who suffer from intermediated to high-risk prostate cancer in Australia since 2003. The primary outcomes in relation to learning curves in robotic surgery have been extensively researched in overseas populations, but there is no study from a cohort of Australian surgeons performing RARP. This study aims to highlight the effect of RARP learning curves on primary surgical outcomes in a high-volume Australian centre. Methods: A retrospective audit of all RARP performed at Epworth Healthcare from 2016 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcome data collected included operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Exclusion criteria were applied. Positive outcomes were set at OT 240 min, blood loss 310 mL, and negative surgical margins. Results: A total of 3969 cases were analysed for a cohort of 53 surgeons. Of these surgeons, 24 surgeons have performed >50 operations to be able to undergo learning curve analysis. The median OT was 229 min, the median blood loss was 353 mL, and most cases had negative surgical margins (>1 mm, Conclusion: We perform a retrospective study of all RARP performed at a high-volume Australian centre. Higher volume surgeons demonstrate that primary outcomes improve with a higher caseload (EBL, PSM). Learning curve transition points for RARP are comparable to international high-volume surgeons. Learning curve data could form the benchmark for RARP training and skills development.

Indexed as

AustralianHigh-volumeLearning curvePrimary outcomesRobotic prostatectomySurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID36910896
PMCPMC9995681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.