ArticleProstate international2023
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning curves and outcomes from an Australian perspective.
Article in Prostate international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06279260 (National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database: Exploring Learning Curves and Long Term Surgical, Oncological and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS)
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic and open surgery: an overview of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Global trends in learning curves of robot-assisted urological surgery: a bibliometric analysis of surgical safety and functional recovery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Post-prostatectomy rehospitalisation rates and risk factors in South Australian men with prostate cancer: evidence from linked data.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of the Chinese surgical robotic system (EDGE MP1000 & MP2000) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single high-volume center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The Role of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Prostate Cancer and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2025Article
- Anterior versus posterior first approach for robot assisted radical prostatectomy-perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.Prostate international · 2025Article
- Learning Curves in Robotic Urological Oncological Surgery: Has Anything Changed During the Last Five Years?Cancers · 2025Review
- Economic Evaluations of Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Methods, Challenges and Opportunities.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Review
- Robotic vs laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of surgeon volume on surgical margins and quality of life.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Training outcomes of novice clinicians in the use of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery: A prospective comparative study.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Learning curve of multiple surgeons for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the cumulative sum method: a retrospective single-institution study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Trifecta Learning Curve for Surgeons with Previous Experience in Laparoscopy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Propensity score matched analysis of functional outcome in five thousand cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus high-intensity focused ultrasound.Prostate international · 2024Article
- Prognosis after radical prostatectomy in men older than 75 years: long-term results from a single tertiary center.Prostate international · 2024Article
- A novel anterior approach that involves Retzius space development between the umbilical ligaments is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative inguinal hernia in robotic radical prostatectomy.Prostate international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been a treatment for men who suffer from intermediated to high-risk prostate cancer in Australia since 2003. The primary outcomes in relation to learning curves in robotic surgery have been extensively researched in overseas populations, but there is no study from a cohort of Australian surgeons performing RARP. This study aims to highlight the effect of RARP learning curves on primary surgical outcomes in a high-volume Australian centre. Methods: A retrospective audit of all RARP performed at Epworth Healthcare from 2016 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcome data collected included operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Exclusion criteria were applied. Positive outcomes were set at OT 240 min, blood loss 310 mL, and negative surgical margins. Results: A total of 3969 cases were analysed for a cohort of 53 surgeons. Of these surgeons, 24 surgeons have performed >50 operations to be able to undergo learning curve analysis. The median OT was 229 min, the median blood loss was 353 mL, and most cases had negative surgical margins (>1 mm, Conclusion: We perform a retrospective study of all RARP performed at a high-volume Australian centre. Higher volume surgeons demonstrate that primary outcomes improve with a higher caseload (EBL, PSM). Learning curve transition points for RARP are comparable to international high-volume surgeons. Learning curve data could form the benchmark for RARP training and skills development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.