Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910838›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2023

The psychological consequences of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) for the family system: A systematic review.

Gabriella Gandino, Alessia Diecidue, Annalisa Sensi, Ester Maria Venera, Sarah Finzi, Cristina Civilotti, Fabio Veglia, Giulia Di Fini

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriella GandinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessia DiecidueDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Annalisa SensiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Ester Maria VeneraDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sarah FinziDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cristina CivilottiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fabio VegliaDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giulia Di FiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is a tragic and difficult experience for families. It involves not only the death of the baby but also the loss of a future as a parent, sibling or grandparent. The subsequent grief is multifaceted and each family member has different needs and resources. Through a systematic review of literature, we identified 24 studies between 1982 and 2021: they dealt with individual, family and couple experience when a SIDS occurs; in addition, some studies compared perinatal loss and neonatal loss with SIDS loss. Our results point out the need for an intervention that focuses on the needs of each family member and tailored around the specifics of SIDS loss rather than general grief.

Indexed as

couple grieffamily griefindividual griefpsychological impactsudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)systematic review

Identifiers

PMID36910838
PMCPMC9995968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.