Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910812›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Predictive power of the DSM-5 criteria for internet use disorder: A CHAID decision-tree analysis.

Laura Bottel, Matthias Brand, Jan Dieris-Hirche, Magdalena Pape, Stephan Herpertz, Bert Theodor Te Wildt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura BottelLWL-University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Matthias BrandGeneral Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Jan Dieris-HircheLWL-University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Magdalena PapeLWL-University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Stephan HerpertzLWL-University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Bert Theodor Te WildtLWL-University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although the majority of internet users enjoy the internet as a recreational activity, some individuals report problematic internet use behaviors causing negative psychosocial consequences. Therefore, it is important to have precise and valid diagnostic criteria to ensure suitable treatment for those affected and avoid over-pathologization. Methods: The aim of the present study was to determine which of the nine DSM-5 criteria of internet gaming disorder (IGD) are crucial in distinguish pathological from non-pathological internet use based on the questionnaire-based response behavior of the participants by applying the Chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) decision tree analysis. Under consideration of the nine DSM-5 criteria for IGD and according to the short-form scale to assess Internet Gaming Disorder (IGDS-SF9) the DSM-5 criteria were formulated as questions and applied to the broader concept of Internet Use Disorder (IUD). The nine questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" to "very often." In accordance with the IGDS-SF9 participants were assigned to IUD-5plus if at least 5 of the 9 criteria were answered with "very often." The study was conducted in Germany ( Results: Although "loss of control," "continued overuse" and "mood regulation" were the most endorsed criteria, the analysis indicated that the criterion "jeopardizing" was found as the best predictor for IUD-5plus, followed by "loss of interest" and "continued overuse." Overall 64.9% of all participants who were in the IUD-5plus, could been identified by the fulfillment of the three criteria mentioned above. Discussion: The results found support for adjustment of the DSM-5 criteria of IGD in accordance to ICD-11. If the predictive power of the three criteria can be replicated in future representative studies, such a decision tree can be used as guidance for diagnostics to capture the particularly relevant criteria.

Indexed as

CHAIDdecision tree analysisdiagnostic criteriaDSM-5gaming disorderICD-11internet gaming disorderinternet use disorder

Identifiers

PMID36910812
PMCPMC9994355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.