Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910732›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Analysis of Breast Aesthetic Revision Procedures after Unilateral Abdominal-based Free-flap Breast Reconstruction: A Single-center Experience with 1251 Patients.

J Michael Smith, Stefanos Boukovalas, Edward I Chang, Jun Liu, Jesse C Selber, Summer E Hanson, Gregory P Reece

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Michael SmithDivision of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex.
Stefanos BoukovalasDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Edward I ChangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Jun LiuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Jesse C SelberDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Summer E HansonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Gregory P ReeceDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although autologous free-flap breast reconstruction is the most durable means of reconstruction, it is unclear how many additional operations are needed to optimize the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructed breast. The present study aimed to determine the average number of elective breast revision procedures performed for aesthetic reasons in patients undergoing unilateral autologous breast reconstruction and to analyze variables associated with undergoing additional procedures. Methods: A retrospective review of all unilateral abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstructions performed from 2000 to 2014 was undertaken at a tertiary academic center. Results: Overall, 1251 patients were included in the analysis. The average number of breast revision procedures was 1.1 ± 0.9, and 903 patients (72.2%) underwent at least one revision procedure. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that younger age, higher body mass index, and prior oncologic surgery on the reconstructed breast were factors associated with increased likelihood of undergoing a revision procedure. The probability of undergoing at least one revision increased by 4% with every 1-unit (kg/m Conclusions: Most patients who undergo unilateral autologous breast reconstruction require at least one additional operation to optimize their breast aesthetic results. Young age and obesity increase the likelihood of undergoing additional operations. These findings can aid reconstructive microsurgeons in counseling patients and establishing patient expectations prior to their undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction.

Identifiers

PMID36910732
PMCPMC9995106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.