Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910699›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting2022

Systematic Approach for Comparing Team-based Care Processes.

Bat-Zion Hose, Julian Conn Busch, Meghan Lane-Fall, Ellen J Bass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bat-Zion HoseDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Julian Conn BuschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Meghan Lane-FallDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Ellen J BassDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care - Understanding ScalabilityR01HL153735 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LANE-FALL, MEGHAN BROOKS · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Team-based care process modeling techniques have focused on understanding and designing solutions for a single site. Less is known about tailoring an effective team-based care process from one site to another, which is necessary for multi-site implementation efforts. We propose an approach for analyzing and comparing a team-based care process performed at two sites to inform redesign opportunities. Our approach includes abstracting the goals and strategies of each process by identifying whether sociotechnical system element differences exist. Element differences may exist for the phase, tasks, roles, information, and technology and tools. Differences in system elements may still support process goals and strategies and, thus, be irrelevant for redesign opportunities. We demonstrate the utility of the approach using an operating room to intensive care unit handoff protocol. This approach should be useful for researchers and practitioners that are tailoring and implementing a successful team-based care process at more than one site.

Identifiers

PMID36910699
PMCPMC9997683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.