ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023
An updated portrait of monocyte-macrophages in classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roles of V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation-mediated immunoregulation in tumor immune escape (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Predictors of sensitivity to immune therapies in classic Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood neoplasia · 2026Review
- Put the CAR-T before the HRS: Advances in Anti-CD30 Immunotherapy Targeting Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg Cells in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Expression and prognostic value of FKBP51 in Hodgkin lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Macrophages and angiogenesis in human lymphomas.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Tackling the dysregulated immune-checkpoints in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: bidirectional regulations between the microenvironment and Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a unique neoplastic ecosystem characterized by a heterogeneous immune infiltrate surrounding the rare malignant Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg cells. Though less abundant than T-cells, tumor-infiltrating macrophages play a pivotal role in supporting HRS survival through cell-to-cell and paracrine interactions. Traditional immunohistochemistry based upon the M1-M2 dichotomy yielded controversial results about the composition, functional role and prognostic impact of macrophages in cHL. More recent studies exploiting single-cell technologies and image analyses have highlighted the heterogeneity and the peculiar spatial arrangement of the macrophagic infiltrate, with the most immunosuppressive subpopulations lying in close proximity of HRS cells and the most tumor-hostile subsets kept far away from the neoplastic niches. High-throughput analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in cHL patients have also identified a novel, potentially cytotoxic, subpopulation predicting better response to PD-1 blockade. This review examines the phenotypic profile, spatial localization and clinical impact of tumor-infiltrating macrophages and circulating monocytes in cHL, providing an up-do-date portrait of these innate immune cells with possible translational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.