Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910586›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)

The association of spouse interactions and emotional learning in interference related to chronic back pain.

Frauke Nees, Katrin Usai, Mina Kandić, Francesca Zidda, Nils Jannik Heukamp, Vera Moliadze, Martin Löffler, Herta Flor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frauke NeesInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Katrin UsaiInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Mina KandićInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Francesca ZiddaInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Nils Jannik HeukampInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Vera MoliadzeInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Martin LöfflerInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Herta FlorInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions affect individual behaviours, preferences, and attitudes. This is also critical in the context of experiencing pain and expressing pain behaviours, and may relate to learned emotional responses. In this respect, individual variability in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), which is involved in adjusting an organism's behaviour to its environment by evaluating and interpreting information within the context of past experiences, is important. It is critical for selecting suitable behavioural responses within a social environment and may reinforce maladaptation in chronic pain. In our study, we used brain imaging during appetitive and aversive pavlovian conditioning in persons with chronic back pain (CBP), subacute back pain (SABP), and healthy controls (HC), together with information on spouse responses to pain behaviours. We also examined the relationship of these responses with pain-related interference in the patients. Our findings yielded a significant negative association between mPFC responses to appetitive and aversive learning in CBP. We also observed a significant negative association for mPFC responses during aversive learning and distracting spouse responses, and a significant positive association between mPFC responses during appetitive learning and solicitous spouse responses in CBP. Both significantly predicted pain-related interference in the CBP group (explained variance up to 53%). Significant associations were not found for SABP or HC. Our findings support an association between appetitive and aversive pavlovian learning, related brain circuits and spouse responses to pain in CBP, where appetitive and aversive learning processes seem to be differentially involved. This can inform prevention and early intervention in a mechanistic approach.

Indexed as

Chronic painLearningMedial prefrontal cortexPain behaviourSpouse

Identifiers

PMID36910586
PMCPMC9996357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.