Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910582›Full record

ReviewJournal of cognition2023

Cognition Assessment Technologies on Deaf People.

Coral I Guerrero-Arenas, Fernando Uristy Osornio-García

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Coral I Guerrero-ArenasDepartamento de Ingeniería en Sistemas Biomédicos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, MX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-6574
Fernando Uristy Osornio-GarcíaDepartamento de Ingeniería en Sistemas Biomédicos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, MX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-4538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing interest in research about the different ways of processing and consolidating cognition in deaf people. It is known that hearing loss can lead to differences in some executive functions like control inhibitory or working memory. This literature review describes executive functions in deaf people and how they could be evaluated through technological devices complementing traditional assessments, like neuropsychological batteries. We identified biometric devices, digital and physical interfaces, and software from the literature, whose goal is to design or adapt technology to assess some cognition domains in several ways. The results of the review suggest the need to understand the cognitive phenomenon that significantly impacts the context of deaf people; moreover, it becomes relevant as a line of research in the Cognitive Science of Hearing. Using technologies to measure them and gain a better understanding of cognition in deaf people may provide possibilities for designing or adapting targeted educational or therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Deafnessexecutive functionstechnology

Identifiers

PMID36910582
PMCPMC10000328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.