Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910580›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2022

Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency in Shared Research Resources: Follow-Up Survey and Recommendations for Improvements.

Andrew W Ott, Katia Sol-Church, Gauravi M Deshpande, Kevin L Knudtson, Susan M Meyn, Sheenah M Mische, Douglas J Taatjes, Michael R Sturges, Christopher W Gregory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew W OttNorthwestern University EvanstonIllinois60208 USA.
Katia Sol-ChurchUniversity of Virginia CharlottesvilleVirginia22903 USA.
Gauravi M DeshpandeLerner Research Institute Cleveland Clinic ClevelandOhio44195 USA.
Kevin L KnudtsonUniversity of Iowa Iowa CityIowa52242 USA.
Susan M MeynVanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTennessee37232 USA.
Sheenah M MischeNew York University Langone Medical Center New YorkNew York10016 USA.
Douglas J TaatjesLarner College of Medicine University of Vermont BurlingtonVermont05405 USA.
Michael R SturgesMiltenyi Biotec, Inc. San DiegoCalifornia92121 USA.
Christopher W GregoryUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel HillNorth Carolina27599 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rigor, reproducibility, and transparency (RR&T) are essential components of all scientific pursuits. Shared research resources, also known as core facilities, are on the frontlines of ensuring robust RR&T practices. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility conducted a follow-up survey 4 years after the initial 2017 survey to determine if core facilities have seen a positive impact of new RR&T initiatives (including guidance from the National Institutes of Health, new scientific journal requirements on transparency and data provenance, and educational tools from professional organizations). While there were fewer participants in the most recent survey, the respondents' opinions on the role of core facilities and level of best practices adoption remained the same. Overall, the respondents agreed that procedures should be implemented by core facilities to ensure scientific RR&T. They also indicated that there is a strong correlation between institutions that emphasize RR&T and core customers using this expertise in grant applications and publications. The survey also assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on core operations and RR&T. The answers to these pandemic-related questions revealed that many of the strategies aimed at increasing efficiencies are also best practices related to RR&T, including the development of standard operating procedures, supply chain management, and cross training. Given the consistent and compelling awareness of the importance of RR&T expressed by core directors in 2017 and 2021 contrasted with the lack of apparent improvements over this time period, the authors recommend an adoption of RR&T statements by all core laboratories. Adhering to the RR&T guidelines will result in more efficient training, better compliance, and improved experimental approaches empowering cores to become "rigor champions."

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFollow-Up StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescorequalityreproducibilityrigorshared research resourcetransparency

Identifiers

PMID36910580
PMCPMC10001929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.