ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2023
One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive Robotic Endoscopic Lipoabdominoplasty for Rectus Diastasis: A Clinical and Demographic Case Series.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for bilateral obturator hernia: a video vignette.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
- Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The robotic platform, an extension of minimally invasive procedures, is distributed nationwide and readily available. However, its application in inguinal hernia repair seems rare in Korea. This report aims to share our initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair. Methods: The patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair by 2 different surgeons with different experiences at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical procedures were performed on all patients using the Da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc). Patient demographics, operation variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 35 patients underwent robotic inguinal hernia repairs consecutively. The mean age was 55.03 ± 18.20 years. The majority of patients were male. The overall mean operation time was 103.98 ± 47.92 minutes for unilateral hernia surgery and 139.28 ± 46.07 minutes for bilateral surgery. None of the patients experienced intraoperative complications. However, postoperative complications were noticed in 8 patients: 3 with seroma formation, 1 with hematoma, 1 with superficial surgical site infection, and 3 with persistent pain at the operation site. Conclusion: This report demonstrates an early experience of hernia surgery using the robotic platform. The robotic approach for transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair was completed without any significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. It may be a viable option as a minimally invasive technique. Cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for the robotic approach remain to be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.