Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910559›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2023

Validation of I71.3 code for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Korea: misplaced diagnosis in claims data.

Eun-Ah Jo, Sujeong Seong, Sanghyun Ahn, Hyejin Mo, In-Mok Jung, Hyo Kee Kim, Hyunmin Ko, Ahram Han, Sangil Min, Seung-Kee Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eun-Ah JoDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9324-4877
Sujeong SeongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0452-0367
Sanghyun AhnDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-4788
Hyejin MoDepartment of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-0863
In-Mok JungDepartment of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-4207
Hyo Kee KimDepartment of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-2326
Hyunmin KoDepartment of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-6860
Ahram HanDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3866-5214
Sangil MinDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0688-0278
Seung-Kee MinDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-2562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Studies in western countries have shown a decline in the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) with advancements in endovascular repair and screening. However, according to health insurance data in Korea based on rAAA code (I71.3), overall rAAA has been increasing. This study aimed to validate the I71.3 code for rAAA and attempt to define the true incidence of rAAA in Korea. Methods: A 20-year multicenter retrospective review of rAAA was undertaken from the period of January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020. All patients were diagnosed with the rAAA code I71.3 in each of the 4 hospitals. The CT images and surgical records of these patients were reviewed to differentiate true rAAA and misdiagnosis. Further data on true rAAA patient outcomes including mortality and treatment success were also collected. Results: A total of 305 rAAA (I71.3) codes were identified in the 4 centers. However, medical record review showed true rAAA in only 131 (43.0%). The remaining 174 cases (57.0%) were misdiagnosed. Impending ruptures were the most common misdiagnoses (37.9%). The total in-hospital mortality including deaths before treatment was 38.9% (n = 51), while mortality of treated patients was 24.4% (n = 15). Conclusion: The analysis of I71.3 code for rAAA showed that only 43.0% were true rAAA and the remaining 57.0% were misdiagnosed. This indicates that the I71.3 code is overestimated in National Health Insurance-based data and that the true incidence of rAAA could be much lower.

Indexed as

Aortic ruptureDiagnostic errorsInsurance claim reviewInternational classification of diseasesPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID36910559
PMCPMC9998958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.