Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910549›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2023

Houston Methodist Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines.

Vy C Dang, Peter J Osztrogonacz, Paul Haddad, Shashank Sharma, Stuart J Corr, Maham Rahimi

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vy C DangTexas A&M School of Medicine, Bryan, Texas, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6520-3157
Peter J OsztrogonaczHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-4363
Paul HaddadHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-5701
Shashank SharmaHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-4737
Stuart J CorrHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-5309
Maham RahimiHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-9205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is an acute aortic condition that requires emergent intervention and appropriate continuity of care to optimize patient outcomes. We describe the standardized RAAA protocol at the Houston Methodist Hospital Acute Aortic Treatment Center, developed to navigate critical patient transfer periods safely and efficiently, make crucial decisions about surgical intervention, and clearly communicate these plans with other care team providers. Our workflow is organized into five phases: prehospital, preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and post-discharge. We identify the transfer center, anesthesia, operating room nursing staff, surgeons, and intensive care unit as key entities of our acute aortic pathology care team. This systematic protocol for the management of acute aortic emergencies such as RAAA identifies critical decision points, potential complications at each stage, and recommendations for best practice.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureAftercareHumansPatient DischargeProtestantismRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomeacute aortic syndromesguidelinespatient outcomesprotocolRAAA Timeoutruptured abdominal aortic aneurysmTHROMBINS2transfer of care

Identifiers

PMID36910549
PMCPMC10000315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.