ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2023
Changing Management of Type B Aortic Dissections.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-Centered Multimodality Imaging of Arterial Wall Fragility in Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Imaging Markers and Clinical Implications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Retrospective cohort development and internal validation of a prediction model for 30-day mortality after TEVAR in type B aortic dissection.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Management and outcomes of thoracic dissection in older adults.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2025Review
- Trends in utilization, timing, and outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection in the United States.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Discussing on the Aortic Coverage in Type B Aortic Dissection Treatment: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this manuscript is to review recent trends in the management of acute type B aortic dissection. Due to its efficacy and low morbidity, thoracic endografting has rapidly been adopted as the treatment of choice for most patients with malperfusion or rupture as a consequence of acute aortic dissection. This technology is increasingly applied to patients without rupture or malperfusion, so-called "uncomplicated" dissections, to reduce the incidence of late aneurysmal degeneration in the ungrafted segments of the thoracoabdominal aorta. A variety of techniques have been proposed, including intentional rupture of the dissection membrane to obliterate the false lumen as well as the candy-plug technique to eliminate retrograde flow in the false lumen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.