Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

External validation of a convolutional neural network for the automatic segmentation of intraprostatic tumor lesions on

Samuele Ghezzo, Sofia Mongardi, Carolina Bezzi, Ana Maria Samanes Gajate, Erik Preza, Irene Gotuzzo, Francesco Baldassi, Lorenzo Jonghi-Lavarini, Ilaria Neri, Tommaso Russo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Samuele GhezzoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Sofia MongardiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Carolina BezziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Ana Maria Samanes GajateDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Erik PrezaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Irene GotuzzoSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Francesco BaldassiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Lorenzo Jonghi-LavariniSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Ilaria NeriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso RussoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BrembillaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Paola ScifoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paola MapelliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Maria PicchioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: State of the art artificial intelligence (AI) models have the potential to become a "one-stop shop" to improve diagnosis and prognosis in several oncological settings. The external validation of AI models on independent cohorts is essential to evaluate their generalization ability, hence their potential utility in clinical practice. In this study we tested on a large, separate cohort a recently proposed state-of-the-art convolutional neural network for the automatic segmentation of intraprostatic cancer lesions on PSMA PET images. Methods: Eighty-five biopsy proven prostate cancer patients who underwent Results: When compared to the manual contouring, the AI model yielded a median dice score = 0.74, therefore showing a moderately good performance. Results were robust to the modality used to acquire images (PET/CT or PET/MRI) and to the ground truth labels (no significant difference between the model's performance when compared to reader 1 or reader 2 manual contouring). Discussion: In conclusion, this AI model could be used to automatically segment intraprostatic cancer lesions for research purposes, as instance to define the volume of interest for radiomics or deep learning analysis. However, more robust performance is needed for the generation of AI-based decision support technologies to be proposed in clinical practice.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkexternal validationprostate cancerPSMAsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36910493
PMCPMC9995820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.