ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Development and validation of an intensive care unit acquired weakness prediction model: A cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the association between vasopressor use and intensive care unit-acquired weakness.Brain and behavior · 2024Pooled it
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting ICU-Acquired Weakness in Postoperative Patients.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- ICU-Acquired Weakness: An Unsolved Clinical Problem: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early Measurement of Quadriceps Response to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Identify Future ICU-Acquired Weakness.Critical care medicine · 2026Observational
- Integrating sarcopenia into ICU-acquired weakness risk stratification: a machine learning-based prediction model for critical care.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Longitudinal variation in muscle strength and mobility in patients in an intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Ultrasound monitoring of skeletal muscle wasting and relation to nutritional intervention in critically ill patients: MUScleNut study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Risk factors of ICU-acquired weakness in sepsis patients.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning-based risk prediction models for ICU-acquired weakness: a prospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive assessment and progression of health status during neurorehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Advancing critical care recovery: The pivotal role of machine learning in early detection of intensive care unit-acquired weakness.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- The knowledge, attitude and behavior of ICU nurses regarding ICU-acquired weakness: a cross-sectional survey.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Balance function in critical illness survivors and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Significant risk factors for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: A processing strategy based on repeated machine learning.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- A scoping review of preclinical intensive care unit-acquired weakness models.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- The Role of Technological Rehabilitation in Patients with Intensive Care Unit Weakness: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At present, intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICU-AW) has become an important health care issue. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an ICU-AW prediction model for adult patients in intensive care unit (ICU) to provide a practical tool for early clinical diagnosis. Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted including 400 adult patients admitted from September 2021 to June 2022 at an ICU with four ward at a medical university affiliated hospital in China. The Medical Research Council (MRC) scale was used to assess bedside muscle strength in ICU patients as a diagnostic basis for ICUAW. Patients were divided into the ICU-AW group and the no ICU-AW group and the clinical data of the two groups were statistically analyzed. A risk prediction model was then developed using binary logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess the model fit. The bootstrap method was used for internal verification of the model. In addition, the data of 120 patients in the validation group were selected for external validation of the model. Results: The prediction model contained five risk factors: gender (OR: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.682-11.042), shock (OR: 3.473, 95% CI: 1.191-10.122), mechanical ventilation time (OR: 1.592, 95% CI: 1.317-1.925), length of ICU stay (OR: 1.085, 95% CI: 1.018-1.156) and age (OR: 1.075, 95% CI: 1.036-1.115). The AUC of this model was 0.904 (95% CI: 0.847-0.961), with sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 85.8%, and Youden index of 0.733. The AUC of the model after resampling is 0.889. The model verification results showed that the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 71.4, 92.9, and 92.9%, respectively. Conclusion: An accurate, and readily implementable, risk prediction model for ICU-AW has been developed. This model uses readily obtained variables to predict patient ICU-AW risk. This model provides a tool for early clinical screening for ICU-AW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.