Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910485›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

Usefulness and limitations of the acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions in non-intubated patients. A narrative review.

Martin Zbiral, Maximilian Weber, Sebastian König, Felix Kraft, Roman Ullrich, Katharina Krenn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Validation of Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin ZbiralDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian WeberDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sebastian KönigDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Felix KraftDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roman UllrichDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina KrennDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the Berlin Definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of at least 5 cmH

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeacute respiratory failureBerlin definitionhigh-flow nasal cannulahigh-flow nasal oxygenhypoxianon-invasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID36910485
PMCPMC9995400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.