Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910418›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Verbal fluency tests assess global cognitive status but have limited diagnostic differentiation: evidence from a large-scale examination of six neurodegenerative diseases.

Shalom K Henderson, Katie A Peterson, Karalyn Patterson, Matthew A Lambon Ralph, James B Rowe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Brief tests for the assessment of language-executive functions: normative data for the Italian population.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Updated Italian norms for the Paired-Associate Learning Test (PALT).Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Development of language composites for enhanced sensitivity to multiple plasma biomarkers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multivariate word properties in fluency tasks reveal markers of Alzheimer's dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shalom K HendersonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5522-2098
Katie A PetersonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
Karalyn PattersonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-7424
Matthew A Lambon RalphMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-2488
James B RoweMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/9Medical Research Council MR/P01271X/1Wellcome Trust 103838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verbal fluency is widely used as a clinical test, but its utility in differentiating between neurodegenerative dementias and progressive aphasias, and from healthy controls, remains unclear. We assessed whether various measures of fluency performance could differentiate between Alzheimer's disease, behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent and semantic variants of primary progressive aphasia, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome and healthy controls. Category and letter fluency tasks were administered to 33 controls and 139 patients at their baseline clinical visit. We assessed group differences for total number of words produced, psycholinguistic word properties and associations between production order and exemplar psycholinguistic properties. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined which measure could best discriminate patient groups and controls. The total word count distinguished controls from all patient groups, but neither this measure nor the word properties differentiated the patient groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that, when comparing controls to patients, the strongest discriminators were total word count followed by word frequency. Word frequency was the strongest discriminator for semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia versus other groups. Fluency word counts were associated with global severity as measured by Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised. Verbal fluency is an efficient test for assessing global brain-cognitive health but has limited utility in differentiating between cognitively and anatomically disparate patient groups. This outcome is consistent with the fact that verbal fluency requires many different aspects of higher cognition and language.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasefrontotemporal dementiaParkinson-plus disordersprimary progressive aphasiaverbal fluency

Identifiers

PMID36910418
PMCPMC9999359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.