Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910337›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2023

Telemedicine in Urology: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading?

Evangelos N Symeonidis, Domenico Veneziano, Hendrik Borgmann, Łukasz Zapała, Athanasios Zachariou, Horst Brenneis, Stefan M Haensel, Helmut Haas, Fotios Dimitriadis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Feasibility and Initial Outcomes of Telesurgery in Urology: a Systematic Review of the Literature.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evangelos N SymeonidisDepartment of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Domenico VenezianoSmith Institute of Urology, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Hendrik BorgmannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Medical School Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Łukasz ZapałaDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Athanasios ZachariouDepartment of Urology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Horst BrenneisDepartment of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Stefan M HaenselDepartment of Urology, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Helmut HaasESUO, Heppenheim, Germany.
Fotios DimitriadisDepartment of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Humanity is facing significant challenges, and in 2019, a new coronavirus caused an unprecedented global disease outbreak. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic vastly impacted health care delivery, generating devastating economic, social, and public health disruption. Although previously underutilized, it was not until recently that telemedicine emerged and amassed tremendous popularity. Objective: To examine and assess telemedicine's past, present, and future roles in urology. Evidence acquisition: We queried relevant literature investigating the role of telemedicine in urology using the electronic PubMed database and mainly focused on English-language studies of any design. Evidence synthesis: Growing attention has been paid to the widespread adoption of novel telehealth technologies for managing various diseases. Meanwhile, solid evidence supports the meaningful use of telemedicine for most urological diagnoses. Existing literature delineates telemedicine as a viable, safe, and convenient alternative to in-person clinical visits. Conclusions: The present article overviews the evolution of telemedicine in urology, and discusses its application in outpatient and physician's office settings. In addition, it highlights the technical, legal, ethical, and financial aspects of telemedicine while providing valuable insights and practical considerations for the future of telehealth in urology. Patient summary: Urologists must adopt telemedicine carefully in daily practice, always adhering to predefined regulatory frameworks.

Indexed as

TelehealthTelemedicineTelementoringTelesurgeryUrology

Identifiers

PMID36910337
PMCPMC9999165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.