ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2023
Effect of renal denervation for patients with isolated systolic hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Selection and Renal Denervation.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- The Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Treating Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Elevated serum levels of leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2 are associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome.Acta diabetologica · 2024Article
- Sympathetic Nervous System and Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal denervation (RDN) is a promising treatment based on catheter intervention for patients with refractory hypertension. However, the effect in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the blood pressure lowing effect of RDN in patients with ISH compared with combined systolic/diastolic hypertension (CH) patients.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for prospective clinical studies that included RDN. The outcomes of interest were the change of 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline. We used the fixed effects model to calculate weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsSix trials were included, with 1405 participants, including 597 patients with ISH and 808 patients with CH. Mean follow-up was five months. The reduction of 24-hour ambulatory SBP was significantly greater for the CH patients than the ISH patients (WMD = 3.89, 95% CI: 2.32-5.45,
conclusionsRDN provides superior blood pressure control in the CH patients compared with the ISH patients, and the CH patients may be the best suitable population for which RDN is indicated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.