Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910199›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

Biological synthesis of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Peng Song, Xue Zhang, Wei Feng, Wei Xu, Chaoyun Wu, Shaoqing Xie, Sisi Yu, Rongzhao Fu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peng SongCollege of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China.
Xue ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China.
Wei FengCollege of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China.
Wei XuCollege of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, China.
Chaoyun WuJiangxi Zymerck Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanchang, China.
Shaoqing XieJiangxi Zymerck Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanchang, China.
Sisi YuJiangxi Zymerck Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanchang, China.
Rongzhao FuJiangxi Zymerck Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a fundamental treatment drug for numerous hepatobiliary diseases that also has adjuvant therapeutic effects on certain cancers and neurological diseases. Chemical UDCA synthesis is environmentally unfriendly with low yields. Biological UDCA synthesis by free-enzyme catalysis or whole-cell synthesis using inexpensive and readily available chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), cholic acid (CA), or lithocholic acid (LCA) as substrates is being developed. The free enzyme-catalyzed one-pot, one-step/two-step method uses hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSDH); whole-cell synthesis, mainly uses engineered bacteria (mainly

Indexed as

biological synthesischenodeoxycholic acidfree-enzyme catalysisursodeoxycholic acidwhole-cell synthesis

Identifiers

PMID36910199
PMCPMC9998936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.