ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2023
The beginning of a new era in induction treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary toxicity of immune checkpoint immunotherapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
- Operable non-small cell lung cancer: induction therapy, adjuvant therapy, or both?Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Induction treatment in operable non-small cell lung cancer: the immune oncology era unfolds.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Improving shared decision making for lung cancer treatment by developing and validating an open-source web based patient decision aid for stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The survival benefit of induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Recently, the outcomes of systemic therapy for NSCLC have dramatically changed with the advent of molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The present review was conducted to investigate the outcomes of induction therapy with reference to randomized control trials (RCTs). Methods: We reviewed RCTs and ongoing clinical trials between 1990 and 2022 using relevant databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE database. We investigated the outcomes of induction therapy. Key Content and Findings: Induction therapy was associated with longer overall survival in comparison to surgery alone in several RCTs for stage III disease. However, its benefit in early-stage (I-II) disease was unclear. Regarding induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, the safety and survival outcomes did not differ between the two arms. Epidermoid growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as induction therapy in patients with proven EGFR mutations may be a sufficient choice for the improvement of overall survival. In ongoing single arm clinical trials and a randomized control study, the administration of ICIs as induction therapy was associated with a good pathological response and satisfactory safety, which will lead to a better survival outcome. Long-term observation is needed to evaluate the toxicity and survival impact of induction therapy with ICIs. Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs for stage IIIA NSCLC may contribute to the improvement of survival outcomes although the effect of systemic therapy on stage I-II remains controversial. ICIs may be considered as a valuable treatment option because of their feasibility and safety for induction therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.