ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
The value of serum Sema4D level in reflecting the inflammatory state of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study sought to investigate the expression of soluble semaphorin 4D (sSema4D) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to explore its value in evaluating the inflammatory status of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: From October 2020 to June 2021, 100 patients with STEMI diagnosed at the Department of Cardiology of our hospital were selected as the STEMI group, 83 patients with unstable angina (UA) were selected as the UA group, and 78 patients with negative coronary angiography (CAG) were selected as the control group. The baseline data of the 3 groups of patients were recorded, the sSema4D levels were determined, the expression of sSema4D levels in AMI was analyzed, and the value of sSema4D levels in reflecting inflammatory state of AMI was explored. Results: Compared with UA group and control group, the expression of sSema4D in peripheral blood of STEMI group was significantly increased (P<0.001), which could better reflect the inflammatory status of patients with STEMI than traditional inflammatory indicators [hypersensitive c-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] (P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that sSema4D (AUC =0.780, cut-off =19.62, 95% CI: 0.629, 0.837, P<0.001) was more specific than hs-CRP (AUC =0.697, cut-off =3.39, 95% CI: 0.629, 0.765, P<0.001) in reflecting the inflammatory status of STEMI patients. Conclusions: sSema4D levels have certain value in reflecting the inflammatory state of STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.