Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36910022›Full record

ArticleHardwareX2023

Low-cost stopped-flow and freeze-quench device for double mixing.

Łukasz Bujnowicz, Rafał Pietras, Marcin Sarewicz, Artur Osyczka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Łukasz BujnowiczDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Rafał PietrasDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Marcin SarewiczDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Artur OsyczkaDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments based on fast reagent mixing and observation of reaction progress are considered a powerful tool for investigating the kinetics of chemical and enzymatic reactions. Various spectroscopic methods are used in monitoring the reaction progress, which require different sample preparation methods. Stopped-flow is the most widespread method, where the reaction in the liquid phase is observed by optical absorption spectroscopy. Albeit less popular, the freeze-quench method is also used, in which the reaction is rapidly stopped by freezing the sample at a given time point after the reaction onset. The frozen droplets of the sample are collected and measured at low temperatures in the solid state. Currently, many commercial solutions are available for freeze-quench or stopped-flow experiments, but despite the high price of the devices, most of these do not allow combining both these methods in a single experiment. This study presents a relatively simple solution that combines both these methods, thus making a complete study of chemical or enzymatic reactions possible. Besides, the presented solution enables sequential double mixing of reagents, which is generally problematic and cannot be done using commercial instruments.

Indexed as

Enzymatic activityFreeze –quenchKinetics of reactionsSequential mixingStopped -flow

Identifiers

PMID36910022
PMCPMC9999200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.