Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36909968›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

Machine Learning Techniques for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction of

Sohail M Noman, Muhammad Zeeshan, Jehangir Arshad, Melkamu Deressa Amentie, Muhammad Shafiq, Yumeng Yuan, Mi Zeng, Xin Li, Qingdong Xie, Xiaoyang Jiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How AI can help us beat AMR.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sohail M NomanDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-5505
Muhammad ZeeshanDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Al-Nafees Medical College and Hospital, Isra University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4197-0735
Jehangir ArshadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Comsats University Islamabad, Lahore Campus 44000, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9196-0458
Melkamu Deressa AmentieDepartment of Information Technology, Assosa University, Assosa 5220, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7270-8006
Muhammad ShafiqDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4346-5903
Yumeng YuanDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-5105
Mi ZengDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-7829
Xin LiDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-0567
Qingdong XieDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-7550
Xiaoyang JiaoDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-0595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Due to the growing availability of genomic datasets, machine learning models have shown impressive diagnostic potential in identifying emerging and reemerging pathogens. This study aims to use machine learning techniques to develop and compare a model for predicting bacterial resistance to a panel of 12 classes of antibiotics using whole genome sequence (WGS) data of Pseudomonas Method: A machine learning technique called Random Forest (RF) and BioWeka was used for classification accuracy assessment and logistic regression (LR) for statistical analysis. Results: Our results show 44.66% of isolates were resistant to twelve antimicrobial agents and 55.33% were sensitive. The mean classification accuracy was obtained ≥98% for BioWeka and ≥96 for RF on these families of antimicrobials. Where ampicillin was 99.31% and 94.00%, amoxicillin was 99.02% and 95.21%, meropenem was 98.27% and 96.63%, cefepime was 99.73% and 98.34%, fosfomycin was 96.44% and 99.23%, ceftazidime was 98.63% and 94.31%, chloramphenicol was 98.71% and 96.00%, erythromycin was 95.76% and 97.63%, tetracycline was 99.27% and 98.25%, gentamycin was 98.00% and 97.30%, butirosin was 99.57% and 98.03%, and ciprofloxacin was 96.17% and 98.97% with 10-fold-cross validation. In addition, out of twelve, eight drugs have found no false-positive and false-negative bacterial strains. Conclusion: The ability to accurately detect antibiotic resistance could help clinicians make educated decisions about empiric therapy based on the local antibiotic resistance pattern. Moreover, infection prevention may have major consequences if such prescribing practices become widespread for human health.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMachine LearningPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID36909968
PMCPMC9995192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.