ReviewBiophysical reviews2023
Expression systems for bovine rhodopsin: a review of the progress made in the Khorana laboratory.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gobind: an inspiring enigma.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here I will review the development of gene expression systems for production of bovine rhodopsin in the Khorana laboratory with particular focus on stable mammalian cell lines made using human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293S). The synthesis of a gene encoding bovine rhodopsin was completed in 1986. This gene was expertly designed with the built-in capacity for DNA duplex cassette replacement mutagenesis which made site-directed mutagenesis relatively straightforward. Intense effort was expended over several years in order to identify a gene expression system capable of producing rhodopsin in milligram amounts as required for biophysical studies. Mammalian expression systems, both transient and stable, were found to be the most favourable based on several criteria including receptor expression levels, correct folding and post translational processing, and capacity for purification of fully functional receptor. Transient expression using COS-1 cells was preferred for routine small-scale production of rhodopsin mutants, while HEK293S stable cell lines were used when milligram amounts of rhodopsin mutants were needed; for example, when conducting NMR studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.