ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2023
Evaluation of the efficacy of RF microneedling and oral isotretinoin in comparison with oral isotretionoin alone in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Probiotic Supplementation in Combination With Doxycycline for the Treatment of Moderate Acne: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Emerging Innovations in Acne Management: A Focus on Non-Pharmacological Therapeutic Devices.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Keloid Formation and Any Skin Complications in Patients Treated With Isotretinoin and Undergone Any Skin-Related Procedures.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin illnesses in teenagers, affecting 80% of people aged 11-30 years. Scars on the face are caused by high inflammation, severe acne, physical manipulation of the skin, and delayed treatment. Aim: To compare the effectiveness and safety of an automated RF micro needling device and oral isotretinoin with oral isotretinon alone alone for treating active acne. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study of 40 moderate acne sufferers. Twenty patients with active acne were treated with an automated RF microneedling device and isotretinoin 0.5-1 mg/kg. Group B included 20 people with active acne, who were given a single dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg isotretinoin. Results: In this cross-sectional research, 40 acne vulgaris patients were divided into 2 groups: group A: 23.8 ±3.2 years old, 58.95 ±5.5 kg, 13 females, and 7 males. There were 15 females and 5 males in group B: 24.4 ±3.7 years old and weighing 56.4 ±8.46 kg. After 12 weeks, group A shows better global acne assessment scale (GAAS) outcomes than group B than group B. After 6 months, group A showed better results than group B. The GAAS meaning global acne assessment scale did not change after 4-8 weeks of treatment. There was no age or weight difference. Conclusions: Acne vulgaris may be treated with fractional RF microneedling. Active acne treatment with RF microneedling is safe and effective, has a quicker response, causes less scarring, and reduces recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.