ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2023
Diagnosis of asthmatic pneumonia in children by lung ultrasound vs. chest X-ray: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest radiography in diagnosing community acquired pneumonia in children.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chest X-ray (CXR) is used as the standard diagnostic method in lung diseases, especially in pneumonia, but unfortunately, despite the high risk of receiving radiation, it also has a high false negative rate. Therefore, some researchers recommend ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia. Aim: To investigate the accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to CXR for the diagnosis of pneumonia children by meta-analysis method. Material and methods: Original articles which evaluated accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest X-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children, published between 1 January 2010 and 20 March 2021, were identified in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were carried out using STATA software. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI), fixed effect model and mean difference with 95% CI, random effect model (REM) were calculated. Results: At the first step, 1016 potentially important research abstracts and titles were discovered in our electronic searches, 8 papers were in agreement with our inclusion criteria. The statistical analysis showed sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI: 93.6-97.1%) and specificity of 96.3% (95% CI: 92.1-98.4%) for the lung ultrasound, and CXR sensitivity and specificity were 87.4% (95% CI: 84.3-90.0%) and 98.6% (95% CI: 95.8-99.6%), respectively. Conclusions: The present study showed that ultrasound can be useful in diagnosing pneumonia in children, and due to the lack of risk of receiving radiation, this method is even more preferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.