Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36909822›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific computed tomography lung phantoms: a reader study.

Nadav Shapira, Kevin Donovan, Kai Mei, Michael Geagan, Leonid Roshkovan, Grace J Gang, Mohammed Abed, Nathaniel B Linna, Coulter P Cranston, Cathal N O'Leary and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lifelike and Deformable Lung Phantoms for 4DCT Imaging: A Three-Dimensional Printing Approach.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. PixelPrint: Generating Patient-Specific Phantoms for Spectral CT using Dual Filament 3D Printing.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  8. LifelikeProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nadav ShapiraDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9294-7001
Kevin DonovanPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Kai MeiDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Michael GeaganDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Leonid RoshkovanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Grace J GangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Mohammed AbedDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Nathaniel B LinnaDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Coulter P CranstonDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Cathal N O'LearyDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ali H DhanaliwalaDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Despina KontosDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Harold I LittDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Webster StaymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Russell T ShinoharaPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-8203
Peter B NoëlDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-6171

Funding

Predictive and Diagnostic Radiomic Signatures in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)on ImmunotherapyR01CA264835 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KATZ, SHARYN, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Framework for radiomics standardization with application in pulmonary CT scansR01EB031592 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE, STAYMAN, JOSEPH WEBSTER · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
Patient-specific, high-sensitivity spectral CT for assessment of pancreatic cancerR01EB030494 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE, NOËL, PETER B · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Nonlinear performance analysis and prediction for robust low dose lung CTR01CA249538 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE · 2021 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264835NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030494NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern clinical decision-support algorithms, heterogeneity in image characteristics due to variations in imaging systems and protocols hinders the development of reproducible quantitative measures including for feature extraction pipelines. With the help of a reader study, we investigate the ability to provide consistent ground-truth targets by using patient-specific 3D-printed lung phantoms. PixelPrint was developed for 3D-printing lifelike computed tomography (CT) lung phantoms by directly translating clinical images into printer instructions that control density on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Data sets of three COVID-19 patients served as input for 3D-printing lung phantoms. Five radiologists rated patient and phantom images for imaging characteristics and diagnostic confidence in a blinded reader study. Effect sizes of evaluating phantom as opposed to patient images were assessed using linear mixed models. Finally, PixelPrint's production reproducibility was evaluated. Images of patients and phantoms had little variation in the estimated mean (0.03-0.29, using a 1-5 scale). When comparing phantom images to patient images, effect size analysis revealed that the difference was within one-third of the inter- and intrareader variabilities. High correspondence between the four phantoms created using the same patient images was demonstrated by PixelPrint's production repeatability tests, with greater similarity scores between high-dose acquisitions of the phantoms than between clinical-dose acquisitions of a single phantom. We demonstrated PixelPrint's ability to produce lifelike CT lung phantoms reliably. These phantoms have the potential to provide ground-truth targets for validating the generalizability of inference-based decision-support algorithms between different health centers and imaging protocols and for optimizing examination protocols with realistic patient-based phantoms.

Indexed as

computed tomographylung imagingphantomsreader studythree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID36909822
PMCPMC9992761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.