Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36909698›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2022

Nemato-toxic analysis of several chopped plant leaves against Meloidogyne incognita affecting tomato In vitro and In pots.

Mohd Ikram, Mohammad Shariq, Faryad Khan, Arshad Khan, Saba Fatima, Mansoor A Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohd IkramSection of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.
Mohammad ShariqSection of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.
Faryad KhanSection of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.
Arshad KhanSection of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.
Saba FatimaSection of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.
Mansoor A SiddiquiSection of Plant Pathology and Nematology, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato plant is affected by several pathogens, including root-knot nematodes (RKNs), belonging to the genus Meloidogyne. Meloidogyne incognita is among the most potent pests infecting tomato roots. Therefore, it is of interest to discuss the management of Meloidogyne incognita using selected botanicals such as Cammelina benghalensis, Evolvulus nummularius, Gomphrena celosioides, Lindenbergia indica, Scoparia dulcis and Vernonia cinerea. The second-stage juveniles (J2s) of M. incognita were directly treated with the aqueous extracts of the botanicals at varied concentration ranging from 10-100%. 100% concentration of Lindenbergia indica was found to be the most toxic against the survival of J2s of M. incognita as compared to other concentrations. In vitro tests also showed the maximum inhibition in egg hatching at 100% concentration after seven days in the extract of Lindenbergia indica. Moreover, botanicals significantly reduced the infestations in relation to number of root galls, eggmasses/root and nematode population/250 g soil in pots. The plant treated with Scoparia dulcis leaves showed the highest nematicidal efficacy with maximum reductions in all the pathological parameters as compared to the untreated control. All treatments resulted in increased growth, physiological parameters and decreased pathological parameters of tomato.

Indexed as

BotanicalsLC-50Meloidogyne incognitanematicidal efficacyroot-knot disease

Identifiers

PMID36909698
PMCPMC9997489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.