Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36909611›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center.

Meenal Kheterpal, Ethan D Borre, Matilda W Nicholas, Edward W Cooner, Donna Phinney, Kelly Gagnon, Leah L Zullig, Heather A King, Elizabeth J Malcolm, Suephy C Chen

Full text readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meenal KheterpalDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University.ORCID 0000-0002-0460-6400
Ethan D BorreDUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.
Matilda W NicholasDUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.
Edward W CoonerDUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.
Donna PhinneyDUHS: Dow University of Health Sciences.
Kelly GagnonDUHS: Dow University of Health Sciences.
Leah L ZulligDUMC: Dongguk University Medical Center.
Heather A KingDUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.
Elizabeth J MalcolmDUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.
Suephy C ChenDUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Funding

Economic Evaluation and Research Prioritization of Adult Hearing Screening in the USF30DC019846 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BORRE, ETHAN D · 2021 to 2022
$88k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC019846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. Methods: We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). Results: At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. Conclusions: Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD.

Indexed as

barriers and facilitatorsimplementation scienceteledermatology

Identifiers

PMID36909611
PMCPMC10002841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read43
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.