ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Strategies for effectively modelling promoter-driven gene expression using transfer learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic promoter design in plants: integration of computational and experimental approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to deliver genetic cargo to human cells is enabling rapid progress in molecular medicine, but designing this cargo for precise expression in specific cell types is a major challenge. Expression is driven by regulatory DNA sequences within short synthetic promoters, but relatively few of these promoters are cell-type-specific. The ability to design cell-type-specific promoters using model-based optimization would be impactful for research and therapeutic applications. However, models of expression from short synthetic promoters (promoter-driven expression) are lacking for most cell types due to insufficient training data in those cell types. Although there are many large datasets of both endogenous expression and promoter-driven expression in other cell types, which provide information that could be used for transfer learning, transfer strategies remain largely unexplored for predicting promoter-driven expression. Here, we propose a variety of pretraining tasks, transfer strategies, and model architectures for modelling promoter-driven expression. To thoroughly evaluate various methods, we propose two benchmarks that reflect data-constrained and large dataset settings. In the data-constrained setting, we find that pretraining followed by transfer learning is highly effective, improving performance by 24-27%. In the large dataset setting, transfer learning leads to more modest gains, improving performance by up to 2%. We also propose the best architecture to model promoter-driven expression when training from scratch. The methods we identify are broadly applicable for modelling promoter-driven expression in understudied cell types, and our findings will guide the choice of models that are best suited to designing promoters for gene delivery applications using model-based optimization. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/anikethjr/promoter_models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.