ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
The epigenetic Oct4 gene regulatory network: stochastic analysis of different cellular reprogramming approaches.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the last decade, several experimental studies have shown how chromatin modifications (histone modifications and DNA methylation) and their effect on DNA compaction have a critical effect on cellular reprogramming, i.e., the conversion of differentiated cells to a pluripotent state. In this paper, we compare three reprogramming approaches that have been considered in the literature: (a) prefixed overexpression of transcription factors (TFs) alone (Oct4), (b) prefixed overexpression of Oct4 and DNA methylation "eraser" TET, and (c) prefixed overexpression of Oct4 and H3K9me3 eraser JMJD2. To this end, we develop a model of the pluritpotency gene regulatory network, that includes, for each gene, a circuit recently published encapsulating the main interactions among chromatin modifications and their effect on gene expression. We then conduct a computational study to evaluate, for each reprogramming approach, latency and variability. Our results show a faster and less stochastic reprogramming process when also eraser enzymes are overexpressed, consistent with previous experimental data. However, TET overexpression leads to a faster and more efficient reprogramming compared to JMJD2 overexpression when the recruitment of DNA methylation by H3K9me3 is weak and the MBD protein level is sufficiently low such that it does not hamper TET binding to methylated DNA. The model developed here provides a mechanistic understanding of the outcomes of former experimental studies and is also a tool for the development of optimized reprogramming approaches that combine TF overexpression with modifiers of chromatin state.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.