ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023
ToxicR: A computational platform in R for computational toxicology and dose-response analyses.
Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Docking, Molecular Dynamics, and QSAR Models to Predict Disruption of Human and Rat Transthyretin Function by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Development of a QSAR model for predicting PPARα activation by PFAS based on human in vitro data of a comprehensive panel of legacy and novel PFAS.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- BiDRA: Bayesian inference as a robust alternative to non-linear regression for dose-response efficiency metrics assessment.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Shiny binary modeling platform: a reproducibility-oriented software platform for structured binary modeling with integrated interpretation, validation support, model comparison, and archive export.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- In Silico Forensic Toxicology: Is It Feasible?Toxics · 2025Review
- An updated comparison of microarray and RNA-seq for concentration response transcriptomic study: case studies with two cannabinoids, cannabichromene and cannabinol.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Mechanisms of Toxicity for Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Comparing Transcriptomic Points of Departure Across Global Versus EV Regulatory Gene Sets.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
- Bioinformatic workflows for deriving transcriptomic points of departure: current status, data gaps, and research priorities.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Review
- The GeoTox Package: open-source software for connecting spatiotemporal exposure to individual and population-level risk.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Modeling omics dose-response at the pathway level with DoseRider.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- The GeoTox Package: Open-source software for connecting spatiotemporal exposure to individual and population-level risk.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Bayesian statistical concepts with examples from rodent toxicology studies.Laboratory animals · 2024Review
- A novel method to derive a human safety limit for PFOA by gene expression profiling and modelling.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic point of departure determination: a comparison of distribution-based and gene set-based approaches.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- An investigation of non-informative priors for Bayesian dose-response modeling.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The need to analyze the complex relationships observed in high-throughput toxicogenomic and other omic platforms has resulted in an explosion of methodological advances in computational toxicology. However, advancements in the literature often outpace the development of software researchers can implement in their pipelines, and existing software is frequently based on pre-specified workflows built from well-vetted assumptions that may not be optimal for novel research questions. Accordingly, there is a need for a stable platform and open-source codebase attached to a programming language that allows users to program new algorithms. To fill this gap, the Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, in cooperation with the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), developed ToxicR, an open-source R programming package. The ToxicR platform implements many of the standard analyses used by the NTP and EPA, including dose-response analyses for continuous and dichotomous data that employ Bayesian, maximum likelihood, and model averaging methods, as well as many standard tests the NTP uses in rodent toxicology and carcinogenicity studies, such as the poly-K and Jonckheere trend tests. ToxicR is built on the same codebase as current versions of the EPA's Benchmark Dose software and NTP's BMDExpress software but has increased flexibility because it directly accesses this software. To demonstrate ToxicR, we developed a custom workflow to illustrate its capabilities for analyzing toxicogenomic data. The unique features of ToxicR will allow researchers in other fields to add modules, increasing its functionality in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.