Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36909352›Full record

ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

ToxicR: A computational platform in R for computational toxicology and dose-response analyses.

Matthew W Wheeler, Sooyeong Lim, John House, Keith Shockley, A John Bailer, Jennifer Fostel, Longlong Yang, Dawan Talley, Ashwin Raghuraman, Jeffery S Gift and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Modeling omics dose-response at the pathway level with DoseRider.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matthew W WheelerBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Durham, NC.
Sooyeong LimMiami University Department of Statistics Oxford, OH.
John HouseBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Durham, NC.
Keith ShockleyBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Durham, NC.
A John BailerMiami University Department of Statistics Oxford, OH.
Jennifer FostelContractor, Division of the National Toxicology Program Durham, NC.
Longlong YangContractor, Division of the National Toxicology Program Durham, NC.
Dawan TalleyContractor, Division of the National Toxicology Program Durham, NC.
Ashwin RaghuramanContractor, Division of the National Toxicology Program Durham, NC.
Jeffery S GiftUS Environmental Protection Agency (B243-01), National Center for Environmental Assessment, Durham, NC.
J Allen DavisNational Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Scott S AuerbachPredictive Toxicology Branch, Division of the National Toxicology Program National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Durham, NC.
Alison A Motsinger-ReifBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Durham, NC.

Funding

Scientific Cyberinfrastructure Research ProgramZIAES103385 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, VICKIE · 2022 to 2025
$17.4M
Methods development for "Omics" dataZIAES103337 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOTSINGER-REIF, ALISON · 2019 to 2025
$5.5M
Statistical Genetics of Dose Response TraitsZIAES103336 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOTSINGER-REIF, ALISON · 2019 to 2024
$1.7M
Non-parametric Bayesian Method DevelopmentZIAES103357 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WHEELER, MATTHEW · 2020 to 2024
$546k
Dose-response Methods Development for High Throughput, Nontraditional, and Standard BioassaysZIAES103358 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WHEELER, MATTHEW · 2020 to 2024
$546k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103357Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need to analyze the complex relationships observed in high-throughput toxicogenomic and other omic platforms has resulted in an explosion of methodological advances in computational toxicology. However, advancements in the literature often outpace the development of software researchers can implement in their pipelines, and existing software is frequently based on pre-specified workflows built from well-vetted assumptions that may not be optimal for novel research questions. Accordingly, there is a need for a stable platform and open-source codebase attached to a programming language that allows users to program new algorithms. To fill this gap, the Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, in cooperation with the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), developed ToxicR, an open-source R programming package. The ToxicR platform implements many of the standard analyses used by the NTP and EPA, including dose-response analyses for continuous and dichotomous data that employ Bayesian, maximum likelihood, and model averaging methods, as well as many standard tests the NTP uses in rodent toxicology and carcinogenicity studies, such as the poly-K and Jonckheere trend tests. ToxicR is built on the same codebase as current versions of the EPA's Benchmark Dose software and NTP's BMDExpress software but has increased flexibility because it directly accesses this software. To demonstrate ToxicR, we developed a custom workflow to illustrate its capabilities for analyzing toxicogenomic data. The unique features of ToxicR will allow researchers in other fields to add modules, increasing its functionality in the future.

Indexed as

Benchmark DoseHigh-Throughput Pathway AnalysisModel Averaged Dose-Response

Identifiers

PMID36909352
PMCPMC9997717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.